Morgan Smith Company received an Army-Navy “E” Award during World War 2. One should note, steam catapults, the type still in use, were not introduced until 1954. The below deck scenes show the complexity of the hydraulic-pneumatic catapults manufactured by the S. This neat 25-minute YouTube video shows above deck and below deck tasks for catapulting airplanes off a U.S. Morgan Smith Company, was capable of reliably launching 9,500-pound airplanes in 73-feet to a speed of 61 knots. The catapult model, manufactured by the S. The fluid was a water base, nonflammable liquid developed for the application. The hydraulic-pneumatic catapults used compressed air as the power medium and fluid as the power-transmitting agent. Some of the traditional carriers were also fitted with catapults. All of the escort aircraft carriers required catapults on the flight deck to launch airplanes because with shorter flight deck, if wind conditions were not just right, catapults were the only way to launch airplanes. The majority of them were the 122 escort aircraft carriers which were about one-half the length of the traditional carriers. The United States built 143 aircraft carriers during World War 2. In the initial search for catapult details I asked around and got the general comment, “I’ve never seen aircraft carrier catapults used in any World War 2 movies.” Neither had I all the more reason to track down the details. I discovered details about those catapults for the lecture, and was pleasantly surprised that search revealed two additional not-well-known manufactured products those will also be covered in the Second Saturday lecture. Morgan Smith Company was a prime contractor for manufacturing hydraulic-pneumatic catapults for launching Navy planes from the decks of aircraft carriers during World War 2. I place the aircraft carrier catapults in the category: known manufactured product however with few details. Morgan Smith Company,” at the York County History Center, more of Smith’s not-well-known manufactured products were discovered. Naval Technology understands that the RFI is part of the Royal Navy’s standard process to understand what industry can deliver and is not related to the soon to be published Integrated Review of Security, Defence, Development and Foreign Policy.During the research for my May 8th Second Saturday Lecture “ Innovations of the S. It is understood that at this stage no further discussions with industry about the potential cats and traps are planned. The RFI is part of a wider push to incorporate more UAVs into its air vehicle fleet across most of its warfighting vessels. It is possible that the ongoing Tempest project to deliver a replacement for the Eurofighter Typhoon from 2035 could produce a carrier-capable aircraft. The Royal Navy Spokesperson added: “The Armed Forces regularly conduct fact-finding exercises with industry partners to understand the latest technological developments and how they can improve existing equipment to meet future threats.” A maritime variant of the uncrewed aircraft could support future carrier strike operations. “This tender is purely an information-gathering exercise to gauge existing technology and it is not an indication of intent of further procurement activity.”Ĭurrently, the UK is to develop a so-called ‘Loyal Wingman’ UAV designed to support the F-35, Typhoon and Tempest Future Combat Air System. In a statement, a Royal Navy Spokesperson told Naval Technology: “The Royal Navy is committed to ensuring it is ready to confront future wars and is exploring the use of novel and innovative technologies including uncrewed air systems. Ford’s electromagnetic aircraft launch system (EMALS) undergoes no-load testing on the ship’s flight deck.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |